Talk about agenda based organizations...  First allow me to say this.  I voted for McCain.  Was I in love with him?  No.  Do I hate Obama, no way.  In this election I was not really excited about either candidate.  And while I liked Obama's call for change, I've seen that campaign call for as many years as I've been voting.  But I will add this, with the Senate and House picking up democratic seats... he's in a position to execute change.   He's poised to effect it where others have not, but I digress...

The 2008 election night was historical, I wouldn't miss it for anything; but Obama's victory was well tainted by media's agenda to get him into office.

The big question now is, what will CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and print outlets such as the LA Times etc... report on for the next 4 years? 

The answer looks like they don't know.  Uh.... lets' go after Palin again?   Hello... Earth to CNN... the election is over guys...  http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/07/mccain.palin/index.html

So here is my point...  During this election I've seen media bias.  Not because I'm a registered Republican, but because I've seen it.  Just recently a study (albeit by a conservative group) documented factually that news coverage on Sarah Palin was negative 18-1. That's 18 negative articles for every 1 positive article or news piece by major networks and publications.  If that is not evidence of bias and agenda, then there is no making my point.  But if you follow me, take for example this ABC News Poll where Palin is unqualified for... well just about anything.

Another example would be the piling on of Palin's daughters pregnancy while John Edward's got a pass from reporters for months if not years on his adultery.   The list could go on. 

Democratic Bloggers involved ...   more »